Abstract or Introduction
As well in theory as both in the practicable reality the question arises repeatedly about the more
convenient research method – the so-called method conflict between quantitative and qualitative
research (Iberer 1).
To go into this discussion and finally draw a conclusion I first define and compare both research
methods and as a next step question its purposes.
To get a better understanding for both research methods I limit my considerations to a clear
distinction and do not go into the question of combining the two. “Quantitative research methods were originally developed in natural sciences to study natural
phenomena” (Myers, Overview of qualitative research).
It’s aim is to capture relevant facts […] and explain them causally with empirical – analytical
methods (Iberer 1).
“Qualitative research methods [on the other hand] were developed in the social sciences to
enable researchers to study social and cultural phenomena” (Myers, Overview of qualitative
research). This method tries to clarify the basic issue of how subjects interpret and see the
world, why and how they act and in which form changes take place (Iberer 1).
After this rough overview I cope with the issue in more detail by opposing one research method
to the other.
- Quote paper
- Andreas Ernst (Author), 2002, Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Research, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.grin.com/document/13183
Similar texts
Publish now - it's free
Comments